By 357777_wd8vx3 
Miss Anthony: But your honor will not deny me this one and only poor privilege of protest against this excessive-handed outrage upon my citizen’s rights. I imagine that to the selections of this court, in criminal instances, no review is allowed, besides in the identical court docket within the informal method through which I now ask your honor to overview the choices made on this trial. I declare therefore that the defendant is entitled to a brand new trial. Seventh-Because Congress had no Constitutional right to pass the act under which the defendant was indicted, and the act and all proceedings under it are void. If this position be right, which I’m not now disposed to question, I respectfully insist that the Congress of the United States had no energy to cross the act in question; that by doing so it has attempted to usurp the rights of States, and that every one proceedings below the act are void.
Miss Anthony: May it please your honor, I am not arguing the question, however merely stating the the reason why sentence cannot, in justice, be pronounced against me. Fifth-Because the Court erroneously held that the query, whether or not the defendant on the time of voting knew that she had not a proper to vote, was a question of legislation to be determined by the Court, and not a query of fact to be determined by the jury. Sixth-Because the Court erred in holding that it was a presumption of legislation that the defendant knew that she was not a legal voter, though in actual fact she had not that information. Third-Because the Court erroneously held, that the defendant had not a lawful right to vote. How then could the defendant be lawfully deprived of the best to ask every juror if the verdict had his assent? Miss Anthony: Yes, your honor, I have many things to say; for in your ordered verdict of responsible, you’ve trampled underfoot every very important principle of our authorities. Miss Anthony: Yes, your honor, however by types of legislation all made by males, interpreted by men, administered by males, in favor of males, and in opposition to ladies; and hence, your honor’s ordered verdict of responsible, against a United States citizen for the train of “that citizen’s right to vote,” simply because that citizen was a lady and not a man.
Even among those who believed girls had no proper to vote, and who didn’t hesitate to say that Miss Anthony’s punishment was inadequate, there was a large questioning as to his authorized proper to take the case from the jury and enter the verdict of responsible, without allowing them in any approach to point their opinion. Review: Although the gimmick of disguising a crook as a priest is fascinating, there were a number of little things about this show that were annoying. As a devoted, to the purpose of self-destructive obsession, follower of the DealExtreme New Arrivals feed, I learn numerous very strangely translated product descriptions. The choice of Judge Hunt was severely criticised. Said Judge Selden: “The warfare has abolished something apart from slavery, it has abolished jury trial. The decision of Justice Hunt was most iniquitous. He had as a lot right to order me hung to the closest tree, as to take the case from the jury and render the decision he did,” and he bowed his head with disgrace at this prostitution of legal energy. The jury with freedom now to make use of their tongues, when too late, also canvassed the trial and the injury carried out.
Sir, as far as my info in regard to legal proceedings extends, that is the one court in any nation the place trial by jury exists, wherein the choices which can be made in the haste and sometimes confusion of such trials, are not topic to assessment earlier than every other tribunal. But failing to get this justice-failing, even, to get a trial by a jury not of my peers-I ask not leniency at your fingers-but quite the complete rigors of the law. Judge Hunt: The Court must insist-the prisoner has been tried in response to the established forms of law. But, yesterday, the identical man-made types of law declared it against the law punishable with $1,000 fantastic and 6 months’ imprisonment, for you, or me, or any of us, to give a cup of cold water, a crust of bread, or a night’s shelter to a panting fugitive as he was tracking his method to Canada. The next instances show, and many others is likely to be cited to the identical impact, that the correct to poll the jury is an absolute proper in all cases, civil and criminal. Even, below such circumstances, a commoner of England, tried before a jury of lords, would have far much less cause to complain than ought to I, a woman, tried earlier than a jury of males.